[–] 11 points 11 months ago

Seems okay-ish if it removes all the AI slop and spam quickly. The mods already have the technical power to dictate things, so this rule change just make their actions tie more closely to their management reputation

  • source
  • [–] 28 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    Building a new way does not adequately means giving up on developer verification. In the last paragraph, Google is also promoting the verification for non-GPlay developers.

    Out of all possibilities in this universe, there may be a chance that these new flows include user verification instead of developer.

    There should also be a rule to rephrase "sideloading" as "installing from non-Google-approved sources" at this point.

  • source
  •  

    Hi all,

    I've opted to use another VPN provider due to costs, but I want to use Mullvad's DoH servers to take advantage of their blocklists (and reputation). I think this would make me stand out compared to users of the VPN, but blocking domains would improve my browsing experience and thwarts other non-browser stuff on my devices (OS telemetry and tracking, etc). Is this setting recommended as a matter of privacy/security?

    Thanks in advance for any help and discussion.

    [–] 2 points 1 year ago*

    If you have the WireGuard config from Mullvad already, just edit your wg.conf files on client devices to route all traffic via the Mullvad servers. Basically replace all the values of the [Peer] block with Mullvad values.

    If you can share your Mullvad wg config file and your wireguard-server config file here, we can sort this out together

    Edit: actually since your only goal is to increase the Mullvad device limits, why not just use Mullvad-provided confs directly in your client WireGuard apps? Should be straightforward to do

  • source