[–] 1 point 6 days ago

Nothing is off limits. Context and messaging are what determine wether the inclusion of a theme is “going too far”.

Unfortunately, it doesn’t seem like the devs of this game think that way. The article just has them talking about whether it’s “scary or satisfying” enough.

I think graphic depictions of all kinds of violence can be a powerful messaging tool if used correctly and responsibly.

Much of modern horror is more than just gore or shock porn. More of more than please, and less of this depraved nonsense.

Is that too puritanical?

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    What are everyone’s thoughts on the Flanagan reboot?

    I found most of it to be excellent, but was really disappointed with the

    Tap for spoilerAddition of a secret society of psychics.
    I think it was very well cast, especially Carrie and her mother and that psycho bitch.

  • source
  • [–] -3 points 1 week ago (5 children)

    When someone professes their love for reading, they’re insinuating that those who do not read are necessarily below them on the cognitive ladder.

    At least that’s how my disdainful mind works.

  • source
  •  

    This review was copied and pasted from my Storygraph. Consider adding me!

    I will always appreciate novels that succeed in western markets  with authentic, informative, and underutilized settings and cultures, especially so when the subject matter so boldly confronts the ceaseless colonial ideologies of the western world. In these aspects, Half of a Yellow Sun hits all the marks.

    However, I found the prose, dialogue, character development, political theory, and plot structure to be tremendously underwhelming. Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie's writing possesses a blunt curtness that was intended, I imagine, to impart a cold and sobering realism upon the reader. For me, however, it encouraged apathy. The characters felt artificial in their conversations with one another, never saying more than a few words before the narration takes over again. Many of the characters will restate the same sentiment in the same way endlessly, as if their purpose is to embody one idea alone. A character's soul-crushing grief is described in whole within the span of fifty pages as nothing more than red eyes and trips to the bar and is never addressed again. Children are forced into atrocious acts and experiences, and the resultant grief is described within two lines. We are told how socialism and nationalism will save the people of Biafra, but we are not told how. The timeline jumps around for no discernible reason.

    While the book certainly sparked my interest in its subject matter, it fell short of providing me with the resources to properly engage with it. Biafra's diplomatic and administrative problems were described briefly, but hardly expounded upon. The reader is much like the protagonists in that they are kept in the dark, uncritical.

    [–] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

    Honestly, skip Monte Cristo for now. If you want to read a big book, read something more unique. Try Dostoyevsky for metaphysical musings, House of Leaves for an SCP-like mindfuck, or Moby Dick for some of the most beautiful writing mankind has ever produced and a truly autistic enthusiasm for the sea.

    I might be in the minority on this opinion, but I find it valid: Monte Cristo shows its age in an unappetizing way and it’s clear the work was serialized. It lacks potency or substance when compared to the other works I mentioned, and it seems like you’ve got a thing for books that say something.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    Do yall not get a printed paper ballot from the machine that you then review and turn in?

    Obviously we have to account for the lowest common denominators; those who are so uncritical they would not review the printed ballot.

    But still, it’s not like the machine is sending your votes in over the internet… right?!

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  •  

    Given that office work is a common form of employment on Lemmy, and given our higher-than average technical ability, I’m interested to hear what bothers you most.

    For me: coworker says “I’m old fashioned” and refuses to employ the simplest keyboard shortcuts (using arrow keys to navigate excel, using Ctrl+C instead of the mouse, et cetera) and then complains about how much their wrist hurts because of their mouse.

    view more: next ›