That would likely violate the first amendment. Many of the ways you use your phone are considered forms of speech/expression. Wholesale banning of sectors of these by a government is a legitimate violation of your rights.

Fuck AI, tho.

Sorry, let me rephrase, Fastmail has been working great for me.

It's been working great for me!

*it being Fastmail

No.

"[redacted] your landlord." Hey, some people manage to pay their rent this way

Please don't F kids

So it seems the legal question is "was polymaker advertising their filament specifically for printing working firearms?"

Them having a couple military style colors for printing toy guns seems pretty far from a specific gun use filament. I was expecting a specific blend of herbs and spices specifically for withstanding the rigors of shooting real ammo or something, not a fucking color that is "military".

Also, good luck trying to probe that they used specific advertising channels to market directly to the ghost gun groups. Flimsy reasoning at best.

Or what, you just won't vote? Not even gonna try to vote for someone that clearly aligns more with your issue as opposed to the option that's entire platform is demonizing the existence of LGBTQ?

Yeah, because the Republicans definitely care more about trans rights

/s

Oh no! That's their kink!

Our system is broken beyond belief for sure, but murder is something that puts you away for a long long time regardless what country you get convicted in, and rightfully so.

Sorry, corroborated!

Still on the fence about the death penalty, it's a coin flip to me if it's worse to spend your life in prison or take a quicker way out. She probably was failed to some degree, but that still isn't an excuse for murder. Life in prison at a minimum.