[–] 14 points 3 days ago

Pretty much finding these kind of errors ARE what vibecoding is good for, AI is pretty good at repetitive tasks like reimplementations,de/recompilations and similar which needs dinamic automation,cybersecurity is one of those matters where AI is pretty good at.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  •  

    As far as i know, communism from an origin and tought as it on the theoretical plane has TWO Big problems and those are:

    1. Comunism tends to not know what actually is needed to produce

    in a capital-less society, being, on this ideal no money, nobody can't really say what its needed, when, and how, hey maybe democracy can do a rough equivalent to that BUT not as good,decentralized and acurate as money itself.

    1. Comunism has a problem on incentives

    Incentives, can be divided into by benefit,you can get something by doing other stuff, or you do that other stuff in hopes of avoiding a not so agradable scenario.

    The thing is that communism, being a stateless, and buisnessless society on its end goal, only has to incentives, happy chemicals for doing something, its a matter that fullfils you or you directly need or social pressure, either good or bad, there is no other ,mostly, third way.

    So I want to know wether how could it work in a modern,globalized society and how those two problems can be solved or not and on the how of the posible solution.

    Btw, I want to know if im being rude or something,and my english is not that good but im genuinelly curious about how the left can solve these problems.

    [–] 1 point 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 child)

    It would be more of a thing about sappiency and about their own culture, even considering they could be wildly diferent to us in biology, they could be cephalopods,birds, bears or even plants or funghi,yes, we can survive without them.

    My principal point is that que are already asuming too many things about those other sapient beings: -theyre animals that cannot reproduce sexualy vía grafts -they have the same fear death than western people -they may not have canibalistic customs about themselves

    And we dont even know if there IS a being that is like that and straight to the point we wouldnt have the alternative to actually subsitute vía emulation.

    Being not compulsory to live doens't mean its not a thing that we can rennounce as fast as a moral vision would like, there is more of nuance and yes, we can survive without animal products but there are big chalenges about It, and more about actually living without them in a normal way,as today we cant really reproduce what meat actually does.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 0 points 6 days ago (3 children)

    So that by itself is a very good question, but the ability of not consuminy it should not mean the obligation(or prohibition), or even the morals on the wheter of eating or not eating meat.

    So thats my argument, we really should not matter that much about what is on the meal of people by itself. Maybe, one day, artificial meat becomes better than normal one and we end up replacing meat, and humannity, accidentally, end up as a vegan species by itself.

    The thing is that involving the morally good or wrong about something like food shouldnt be a thing if it can be improved or obsoleted.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • view more: next ›