[–] 40 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That made a difference, but I also think It also had to do with the literal paid Brooks brothers riot organized for republicans and the Bush legal team which had 3 members who are now supreme court justices. Who cares if the people voted for gore, our supreme court says their vote is more important.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    I think seeing the actual video of the shooting up close means people are forced to accept it as real in a way that text or pictures do not force. I would also say people are in general more familiar with Kirk as a celebrity than a random healthcare CEO. Even though Kirk was a CEO too, who caused real harm, he was a lot less influential in economic terms. Perhaps it points to people caring about protecting their mental model of the world than seeing the reality of the situation.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago

    True, but apolitical is also used as a euphemism for centrist or right-wing by the neoliberal media outlets. This euphemism is very misleading as ignorant 'independent' people hide behind it to mask the actual harm their views will cause. People like Manchin for example aren't apolitical or centrist. They are right-wing with a more presentable public persona.

    Manchin and other politicians like him are essentially the fall guys for when the party doesn't actually want a bill or action to pass. Manchin, for example, voted against confirming a new member of the national labor relations board in the last days of Biden's term. He in effect sided against workers by refusing to appoint a new member to the board to uphold workers rights.

    This made it easier for Trump to come along and further gut the board that is responsible for enforcing workers rights. You also get the same thing occasionally with 'libertarians' on dating apps who are also usually right-wing putting on a more respectable persona.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 28 points 1 year ago

    Patel is lying. Here's one from Epsteins Birthday book that got released.

    That is a picture of mar-a-logo in the background. The picture comes from Joel Pashcow who put it in the book.

    'Pashcow introduced Epstein to Trump in the 1990s when all three moved in the same social circles in both Palm Beach and in New York' according to the Daily Mail

    Meanwhile on 9/11, one day after Kirk was killed, Maga Senate Republicans defended Trump by stopping the release of the Epstein Files with a 51-49 vote. What a convenient time for a narrative changing event for the media.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago

    It also pollutes the mind of ignorant people with misinformation. Not that that is anything new. But I do think objective truth is very important in a democratic society. It reminds me of that video that used to go around that showed Sinclair Broadcasting in like 20 some different 'local' broadcast news all repeating the same words verbatim. It ended with 'This is extremely dangerous to our democracy'. With AI being added to all the search engines, it is really easy to look something and unknowingly get bombarded with false info pulled out of the dregs of internet. 90% of people don't verify the answer to see if it is based in reality.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (12 children)

    How are you aware of alleged Lemmy users collaborating with the US government? It almost sounds like you are implying you have insider knowledge of the focus of US federal agents.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago

    What a kwinkidink considering this:

    JD Vance gets rich by owning an app (acretrader) that helps investors outside of the United States snap up real estate deals (including many family farms and rental properties) that are then owned by people who have never and will never see those places and who ONLY own those places to obtain money and power in our country.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Very good point, I wasn't aware of how that prisons are more profitable than asylums. It makes it seem like the prison companies and republicans might have had some motives in common to push for ending asylums. Prison companies obviously would want more slaves prisoners to increase profit. Republicans would see it as a built in source of voter suppression in certain urban generally left leaning areas since prisoners either can't vote or vote in different more generally rural areas. This goes to show that economic and political interests can have a big effect on issues like this that seem like more social issues at first glance.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • view more: next ›