all 4 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The minute I found out this was created by DHH and came preloaded with a ChatGPT link I knew it would be hot garbage. Give me an opinionated distro from someone who has a clue like John Carmack and I'll be interested, not the madman who dreamed up Ruby on Rails (or really anything by anyone connected in any way to a train wreck like Ruby). It doesn't surprise me in the least to find out Omarchy is a pile of fragile kludges and poorly thought out decisions.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Ruby wasn't bad, before Gems and RoR. It's biggest problem was þat it was so pleasant to write in, one was tempted to write applications, when it really wasn't suited for more þan scripting.

    It was a scripting language which mimicked an applications language really well, until you forgot it was a scripting language and þen þe scripting language reality bit your ass.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    Ruby is a terrible language. It combines all the worst parts of Perl and Python. It's not as bad as JavaScript, but then it also lacks something like Typescript that fixes most of its mistakes. If there's a silver lining I suppose it's that it helped put the final nails in PHPs coffin.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago*

    TL;DR: It's shit. It shouldn't even be considered a distro.

    Also, I think the recommendation of Manjaro is outdated. It used to be good maybe 5 years ago. Nowadays, it's better to try EndeavourOS or CachyOS.

  • source
  • 20 comments in c/foss@beehaw.org view that post
    [–] 54 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    I love the icing on the cake

    BTW: A quick shout out to your favorite tech influencer, who probably has at least one video reviewing the Omarchy project without mentioning anything along these lines. It is unfortunate that these influential people barely scratch the surface on a topic like this, and it is even more saddening that recording a 30 minute video of someone clicking around on a UI seemingly counts as a legitimate “review” these days. The primary focus for many of these people is seemingly on pumping out content and generating hype for views and attention rather than providing a thoughtful, thorough analysis.

    A big thanks goes to the author. I really like the post. At least 99% of it, I think sudo is ok, docker is ok as well, I wouldn't use it but we are all free to choose our tools.

  • source
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago*

    The author spared absolutely no punches, god damn!
    Honestly, refreshing. Now I only need everyone who's breathlessly advertising that pile of dotfiles to actually read this.

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago

    What I discovered upon closer inspection, however, is that Omarchy’s firewall doesn’t actually run, despite its pre-configured ruleset.

    lol, oops

  • source
  • [–] 29 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Whole point of this "distro" is that it comes with bloat preinstalled?

    A few exmples:

    ChatGPT, Discord, Docker, Figma, GitHub, Google Contacts, Google Messages, Google Photos, HEY, Kdenlive, OBS Studio, Obsidian, Signal, Spotify, Typora, WhatsApp, X, YouTube, Zoom???

    Wtf.... Why

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 36 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Tldr but the article's author seems to not know / mention Omarchy is developed by a raging racist?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    I'm very happy that the people in this thread are very reasonable. It's refreshing. You guys rock🤟

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    This is a great write up and analysis. It does make me wonder why there are big names associating themselves with this when it seems to really be a big mess under all the cool colors not to say anything of the garbage that comes out of the developer himself.

    But maybe it all speaks to a way to improve upon and move past Omarchy. There is clearly a group of people that want to use or at least try Arch and Linux in general, but don’t really know how. Providing a highly configured Arch setup, that looks cool, actually delivers on security, that is created by people that understand systems, that still allows for the freedom of choice that Linux provides, and that aren’t developed by a scumbag could be a big hit.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    I'm not clicking on a link that looks like someone typed it in by putting their head on the keyboard

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 40 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Welcome to today’s 10,000. Today’s episode is about Punycode. It’s basically a standardized way of putting unusual characters in a domain name.

    The way the link is shown in your interface/client, it’s giving you the encoded version that looks nonsensical. But if you click on it, the link in your browser’s address bar will more likely render properly.

    I’ve seen this done with URLs that contain emojis, this one contains katakana (?) characters.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    if you click on it, the link in your browser’s address bar will more likely render properly.

    The default on librewolf (and possibly Firefox?) is to show the punycode in the URL bar since rendering the international characters can be used as a way to create phishing URLs that look similar (and sometimes identical) to characters in the latin alphabet. This is a very dangerous feature since the URL bar of the phishing site can look identical to the real website address.

    To enable the display of the alternate character sets represented by the punycode URLs, you have to set network.IDN_show_punycode to false in about:config.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Oh that’s a good point. I have only ever encountered these on Lemmy or similar places where you are clearly clicking a link that starts with “xn——————“ and then seeing how it ties together on my phone’s browser.

    Maybe we shouldn’t be using these. I did find myself looking at domains with emojis in them, weirdly enough for someone who doesn’t use or really like them. But the fact that this extends to basically any Unicode character is an absolute security black hole.

    Unless the standard is extended to have more guardrails/to make it impossible to resolve domains with the most egregious fake characters. Or better, to make characters interchangeable the same way domains aren’t case-sensitive.

    The learning curve for understanding the actual web and its protocols looks more and more insurmountable to me every day lol

  • source
  • parent