[–] 1 point 2 months ago (1 child)

I like the sentiment, but what does EUPL do that AGPL doesn't do? Doesn't AGPL also fix the SaaS problem?

I would honestly also prefer a license that discourages monetary use without payment.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago

    Yeah I think it makes sense if you're providing a service but to label the software makes no sense. What if someone from, say, India provides translations or any other contribution. Is the software still European? The answer doesn't matter so there's no point arguing about it and so there's no point labelling it in the first place. On the other hand if you provide a service it is now very important where that service is being operated from, to know what legal rights you have about the data you send to the service.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago

    from the article

    As you can see from the video below I find the concept of a “European Game Engine” silly in the age of global development as well as we explore nearly a dozen existing European rooted game engines. Again as far as that can be defined in the age of the internet that is!

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • view more: next ›